Adecuación a las recomendaciones diagnósticas en pacientes con neumonía por Pneumocystis jirovecii tratados con pentamidina intravenosa / Adequacy to diagnostic recommendations in patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia treated with intravenous pentamidine

Objetivos. Determinar la tasa de confirmación microbiológica en el diagnóstico de la neumonía por Pneumocystis jirovecii en pacientes tratados con pentamidina intravenosa y la potencial correlación con la efectividad y seguridad del tratamiento. Material y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo unicéntrico (2010-2020), que incluyó aquellos pacientes que recibieron tratamiento con pentamidina intravenosa durante al menos 48 horas. Se registró el procedimiento de recogida de la muestra y el análisis microbiológico realizado. Se determinó la eficacia según la tasa de mortalidad a los 14 días e ingreso en Unidad de Vigilancia Intensiva (UVI), y el control de la enfermedad, mediante la duración de estancia hospitalaria y tiempo desde la finalización del tratamiento hasta el alta. El perfil de seguridad se evaluó según la Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Resultados. Un total de 17 pacientes con neumonía por P. jirovecii fueron tratados con pentamidina (76,5% hombres (n=13); edad media [desviación estándar]: 58,6 [15,5]). En el 47,1% (n=8) de los casos se estableció una confirmación microbiológica del patógeno. El empleo dirigido con pentamidina redujo de forma significativa el tiempo desde la finalización del tratamiento hasta el alta hospitalaria (p=0,019). El perfil de seguridad fue aceptable, apareciendo toxicidad grado I en un paciente. Conclusiones. El estudio muestra como más del 50% de los pacientes reciben tratamiento a partir de un diagnóstico presuntivo y sin ajustarse a las recomendaciones establecidas, repercutiendo en la duración de ingreso y recuperación del paciente. Serán necesarios futuros estudios con un mayor tamaño muestral para consolidar los resultados obtenidos (AU)

Objectives. To determine the rate of microbiological confirmation in the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients treated with intravenous pentamidine and the potential correlation with treatment effectiveness and safety. Material and methods. Single-centre retrospective study (2010-2020), which included those patients who received intravenous pentamidine treatment for at least 48 hours. The sample collection procedure and the microbiological analysis performed were recorded. Efficacy was determined by 14-day mortality rate and admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and disease control was determined by length of hospital stay and time from completion of treatment to discharge. The safety profile was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0.Results. A total of 17 patients with P. jirovecii pneumonia were treated with pentamidine (76.5% male (n=13); mean age [standard deviation]: 58.6 [15.5]). Microbiological confirmation of the pathogen was established in 47.1% (n=8) of cases. Targeted use of pentamidine significantly reduced the time from treatment completion to hospital discharge (p=0.019). The safety profile was acceptable, with grade I toxicity occurring in one patient. Conclusions. The study shows that more than 50% of patients receive treatment based on a presumptive diagnosis and without adhering to the established recommendations, with repercussions on the duration of admission and recovery of the patient. Future studies with a larger sample size will be necessary to consolidate the results obtained. (AU)

Estudo comparativo entre o antimoniato-n-metilglucamina (glucantime) e o isotionato de pentamidina (pentacarinat) em lesões cutâneas da leishmaniose tegumentar / Comparative study of antimony-n-methylglucamine (glucantime) and pentamidine isethionate (Pentacarinat) in skin lesions of cutaneous leishmaniasis

O prognóstico da leishmaniose cutânea (LC) com o uso dos antimoniais pentavalentes (Sb+5) de um modo geral é considerado bom, embora alguns casos tornem-se refratários à terapêutica tradicional. Infelizmente, não existem marcadores de gravidade da doença ou marcadores de resposta terapêutica, limitando a utilização de formas de tratamento mais efetivas. Em alguns casos, porém, existe a necessidade de utilizar outras drogas, como a anfotericina B (desoxocolato) e as pentamidinas (isotionato e mesilato), consideradas como drogas de 2ª escolha no tratamento das leishmanioses, sendo de fundamental importância à busca de novos esquemas terapêuticos. O objetivo do estudo foi comparar a eficácia entre o antimoniato-N-metilglucamina (Glucantime®) e o isotionato de pentamidina (Pentacarinat®) no tratamento da forma cutânea da leishmaniose tegumentar (LT)...

The prognosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) with the use of pentavalents antimonials (Sb+5) is generally considered good, although in some cases have become refractory to conventional therapy. Unfortunately there are no markers of disease severity or markers of therapeutic response, limiting the use of more effective forms of treatment. In some cases, however, there is a need for other drugs such as amphotericin B (desoxycholate) and pentamidine (isethionate and mesylate), which are considered as the second choice in the treatment of leishmaniasis, since few studies with reduced doses of these drugs demonstrated encouraging results in tegumentary leishmaniasis (TL), which is paramount in the search for new therapeutic regimens using proven antileishmanial drugs. We have compared the effectiveness between the N-methylglucamine antimoniate (Glucantime®) and pentamidine isethionate (Pentacarinat®) in the treatment of CL in an endemic area of tegumentary leishmaniasis (TL)...

Profilaxis de neumonía por Pneumocystis jiroveci en niños y adultos sometidos a trasplante de órganos sólidos y de precursores hematopoyéticos / Prophylaxis against Pneumocystis pneumonia in pediatric and adult patients undergoing solid organ or hematopoietic stem cells transplantation

Pneumocystis jiroveci is an important pathogen in patients undergoing SOT and HSCT. Universal prophylaxis is recommended for all adults and children with SOT and HSCT, considering that its use significantly reduces the occurrence and mortality associated with pneumonia by this agent. The drug of choice is cotrimoxazole (A1) three times a week, low-dose scheme, that has proved equally effective and better tolerated than the daily regimen and/or at high doses. Prophylaxis starts 7 to 14 days post transplant in SOT recipients and post-implant in HSCT, with an average duration of 6 months except in liver and lung transplant as in HSCT with significant degree of immunosuppression, that lasts for 1 year. Alternatives for prophylaxis are dapsone (B2), aerosolized pentamidine (B2) and atovaquone (C2).

Pneumocystis jiroveci es un patógeno importante en pacientes sometidos a TOS y TPH. Se recomienda proilaxis universal a todos los pacientes adultos y niños sometidos a TOS o TPH porque su uso reduce signiicati-vamente la ocurrencia y mortalidad asociada a neumonía por este agente. El medicamento de elección es cotrimoxa-zol (A1) tres veces por semana, en dosis bajas, esquema que ha demostrado igual eicacia y mejor tolerancia que el esquema diario y/o con dosis altas. La proilaxis se inicia 7 a 14 días post trasplante en TOS y posterior al implante en TPH, con una duración promedio de 6 meses salvo en trasplante de hígado y pulmón en que se prolonga por 1 año, al igual que en TPH con grado importante de inmunosupresión. Son alternativas de profilaxis dapsona (B2), pentamidina aerosolizada (B2) y atavacuona (C2).

Estudo clínico randomizado comparando antimoniato de meglumina, pentamidina e anfotericina B para o tratamento da leishmaniose cutânea ocasionada por Leishmania guyanensis / A randomized clinical trial comparing meglumine antimoniate, pentamidine and amphotericin B for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis by Leishmania guyanensis

FUNDAMENTOS: O tratamento da leishmaniose tegumentar americana (LTA) ainda constitui desafio, pois a maioria dos medicamentos é injetável e têm-se poucos ensaios clínicos randomizados comparando a eficácia das drogas. Além disso, é provável que as espécies de Leishmania tenham influência nas respostas terapêuticas. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar e comparar a eficácia e a segurança dos esquemas de tratamento na LTA, ocasionada por Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis. MÉTODOS: 185 pacientes foram selecionados, conforme critérios de elegibilidade, e distribuídos, aleatoriamente, em 3 grupos - 2 com 74 enfermos e outro com 37 - que receberam, respectivamente, antimoniato de meglumina, isotionato de pentamidina e anfotericina B em doses, períodos e vias de administração padronizados. Os enfermos foram reexaminados um, dois e seis meses após o final dos tratamentos. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença entre os grupos terapêuticos em relação ao sexo, idade, número ou local das lesões. A análise por intenção de tratar (ITT) mostrou eficácias de 58,1 por cento para a pentamidina e 55,5 por cento para o antimoniato (p=0,857). O grupo da anfotericina B foi analisado separadamente, pois 28 (75,7 por cento) pacientes negaram-se a continuar no estudo após a randomização. Eventos adversos leves ou moderados foram relatados por 74 (40 por cento) pacientes, principalmente artralgia (20,3 por cento), para o grupo do antimoniato, e dor (35,1 por cento) ou enduração (10,8 por cento) no local das injeções para a pentamidina. CONCLUSÕES: A pentamidina tem eficácia similar ao antimonial pentavalente para o tratamento da LTA ocasionada por L. guyanensis. Face aos baixos resultados de eficácia apresentados por ambas as drogas, necessita-se, com urgência, investigar novas opções terapêuticas para esta enfermidade.

FUNDAMENTALS: American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL) treatment remains a challenge, since most available drugs are injectable and only a small number of comparative, randomized clinical trials have been performed to support their use. Moreover, treatment outcome may depend on the causative species of Leishmania. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and tolerability of meglumine antimoniate, pentamidine isethionate, and amphotericin B in the treatment of ATL caused by Leishmania (Viannia) guyanensis. METHODS: 185 patients were selected according to the eligibility criteria and randomly allocated into three groups - two groups with 74 patients each, and one group with 37 patients, which underwent meglumine, pentamidine and amphotericin B treatment, respectively. Doses, mode of administration and time periods of treatment followed the current recommendations for each drug. Patients were re-examined one, two and six months after completion of treatment. RESULTS: No differences were observed among the therapeutic groups in relation to gender, age, number or site of lesions. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed efficacy of 58.1 percent for pentamidine and 55.5 percent for meglumine (p=0.857). The amphotericin B group was analyzed separately, since 28 patients (75.7 percent) in this group refused to continue participating in the study. Mild or moderate adverse effects were reported by 74 (40 percent) patients, especially arthralgia (20.3 percent) in the meglumine group, and pain (35.1 percent) or induration (10.8 percent) at the site of injection in the pentamidine group. CONCLUSION: Pentamidine and meglumine show similar efficacy in the treatment of ATL caused by L. guyanensis. Given the low efficacy of both drugs, there is an urgent need for new therapeutical approaches.